Kinship Caste and Class notes,
Class 12 History Chapter 3 Notes
Here, we are providing notes for the first chapter of Class 12 History: “Kinship, Caste, and Class.” This chapter explores the key features associated with the era of kinship, caste, and class.
These notes will prove beneficial for students preparing for their board examinations this year. Crafted in simple and organized language, this material will aid in quickly revising the chapter and retaining key points.
Kinship Caste and Class notes, Class 12 History Chapter 3 Notes

class 12 history chapter 3 notes
Mahabharata
- The Mahabharata is an epic of Hinduism.
- Ved Vyasa is credited as the author of the Mahabharata.
- The Mahabharata consists of 18 Parvas (books) and 1,948 chapters.
- The Mahabharata describes the war fought between the Kauravas and the Pandavas.
- The Pandavas emerged victorious in the Mahabharata war.
- The Mahabharata war was fought at Kurukshetra and lasted for 18 days.
The Shrimad Bhagavad Gita
- The teachings that Shri Krishna imparted to Arjuna during the Battle of Kurukshetra are precisely what constitute the Shrimad Bhagavad Gita.
- The Shrimad Bhagavad Gita represents the most significant essence of the Mahabharata.
- The Gita consists of a total of 18 chapters and 700 verses.
- The English translation of the Gita was undertaken by Charles Wilkins in 1785.
How many types of marriages were described in the Mahabharata?
The Mahabharata described eight types of marriage.
- Deva Marriage,
- Arsha Marriage,
- Prajapatya Marriage,
- Asura Marriage,
- Gandharva Marriage,
- Rakshasa Marriage, and
- Paishacha Marriage.
Among these, the first four forms of marriage were considered excellent, while the last four were considered reprehensible.
The Mahabharata: A Dynamic Text
- According to Hindu tradition, the author of the *Mahabharata* is Maharishi Vyasa, who is said to have dictated the text to Lord Ganesha; however, many historians do not agree with the view that the *Mahabharata* had a single author.
- In their opinion, it is a dynamic text to which significant additions were made over the course of time.
- Some other scholars suggest, “It is possible that the original narrative was composed by bards—known as *Sutas*—who served as charioteers.”
- These bards would accompany regional warriors onto the battlefield and compose verses celebrating their victorious exploits.
Critical Edition of the Mahabharata
In 1919, a highly ambitious project was initiated under the leadership of the renowned Sanskrit scholar V.S. Sukthankar. A group of scholars collectively undertook the task of preparing a critical edition of the Mahabharata.
(i) Initially, Sanskrit manuscripts of the Mahabharata—written in various scripts and originating from different parts of the country—were collected. The scholars working on the project devised a method to compare the verses found across all these manuscripts. Ultimately, they selected those verses that appeared in almost all the manuscripts and published them in numerous volumes spanning 13,000 pages.
(ii) It took forty-seven years to complete this project. Two points emerged with particular clarity during this entire process: First, there was a remarkable degree of commonality across various sections of the Sanskrit texts. This is evident from the fact that this uniformity was observed in manuscripts found throughout the entire subcontinent—ranging from Kashmir and Nepal in the north to Kerala and Tamil Nadu in the south. The second point that became evident was that, over the centuries during which the Mahabharata was transmitted, numerous regional variations also emerged.
(iii) These variations were compiled in the form of footnotes and appendices to the main text. Of the 13,000 pages, more than half are devoted to detailing these variations. In the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, when historians first began to analyze issues of social history, they tended to interpret these texts somewhat superficially.
(iv) Subsequently, scholars undertook the study of other traditions through the medium of Pali, Prakrit, and Tamil texts.
These studies made it clear that while normative Sanskrit texts were generally regarded as authoritative, the ideals they espoused were also viewed critically—and, on occasion, even disregarded. We must bear this in mind when interpreting the manner in which historians have reconstructed social histories.
Manusmriti
- The *Manusmriti* is an ancient scripture (*Smriti*) of Hinduism. It is also known by names such as *Manava-Dharma-Shastra* and *Manu-Samhita*.
- Religious scholars have followed the *Manusmriti*, accepting it as a reference text.
- The *Manusmriti* was compiled approximately between 200 BCE and 200 CE.
According to the Manusmriti
Man's Property
- According to the *Manusmriti*, ancestral property should be divided equally among all sons following the death of their parents; however, the eldest son was entitled to a special share.
- Generally, men exercised control over land, livestock, and wealth. According to the *Manusmriti*, a man can acquire wealth in seven ways-
i. Inheritance,
ii. Discovery,
iii. Purchase,
iv. Conquest,
v. Investment,
vi. Through labor,
vii. Gifts from benefactors, etc.
Stridhan
1. At the time of marriage, women were considered to hold ownership over the gifts they received; this was designated as *Stridhan*—literally, a woman’s wealth.
2. This property could be inherited by their children, and their husbands held no rights over it.
According to the *Manusmriti*, wealth could be acquired in six ways:
(i) Gifts received at the time of marriage
(ii) Gifts from parents as a token of affection
(iii) Gifts from a brother as a token of affection
(iv) Gifts received during the bridal procession
(v) Gifts received from one’s husband
(vi) Money received from one’s husband
The Problems of Women in the Mahabharata Era
(1) Women were regarded as objects of pleasure.
(2) Women could not claim a share in ancestral property.
(3) The status of women was inferior to that of men.
(4) A wife was considered to be the property of her husband.
(5) Women possessed only limited rights.
Patrilineality and Matrilineality
Patrilineality
It is a lineage tradition that proceeds from the father, followed by the son, grandson, great-grandson, and so on. Under patrilineality, upon the father’s death, the son could lay claim to his resources—or, in the context of kings, even to the throne.
Matrilineality
The lineage associated with the mother’s name is called matrilineality.
Exogamy
(i) When an individual married outside their own *gotra*, the system of marriage was termed *exogamy*; such marriages were in accordance with the Brahmanical tradition.
(ii) This practice was adopted to ensure that the lives of young girls and women belonging to families of high status were meticulously regulated, thereby enabling their marriage at the ‘appropriate’ time and to the ‘appropriate’ person. Consequently, *Kanyadana*—the ritual gift of a daughter during marriage—came to be regarded as a significant religious duty of the father.
Duties of Chandalas according to Manusmriti
(i) Those who performed the cremation of corpses and handled dead animals were referred to as *Chandalas*. In the *varna*-based social order, they were relegated to the lowest stratum.
(ii) People of the upper castes—who considered themselves to occupy the highest position in the social hierarchy—regarded contact with these *Chandalas*—and even the mere act of seeing them—as ritually polluting.
(iii) The *Manusmriti* outlines the duties prescribed for *Chandalas*; they were required to reside outside the village. They used discarded utensils, wore the garments of the deceased, and adorned themselves with iron ornaments.
(iv) *Chandalas* were forbidden from moving about in villages and towns during the night. They were tasked with performing the funeral rites for the deceased who had no surviving relatives, and they were also required to serve as executioners.
(v) While walking on the streets, the “untouchables” were compelled to announce their presence by clanging cymbals, thereby enabling others to avoid the ritual impurity associated with merely catching sight of them.
Dharmasutras and Dharmashastras
- The emergence of new towns rendered social life more complex.
- People from both near and far gathered here; alongside the buying and selling of goods, this urban environment also facilitated an exchange of ideas.
- Perhaps as a result of this, established beliefs and practices were called into question.
- In response to this challenge, the Brahmins formulated elaborate codes of conduct for society.
- While the Brahmins were required to adhere strictly to these codes of conduct, the rest of society was also expected to follow them.
- From approximately 500 BCE onwards, these norms were compiled into Sanskrit texts known as the *Dharmasutras* and *Dharmashastras*.
The Varna System
- The Varna system was prevalent in Indian society.
- Indian society was divided into four Varnas.
- Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaishyas, and Shudras.
- According to the *Purusha Sukta* of the *Rigveda*, the origin of the four Varnas is believed to stem from the four limbs of the Cosmic Being (*Virat Purusha*).
- It is believed that the Brahmins originated from the mouth, the Kshatriyas from the arms, the Vaishyas from the thighs, and the Shudras from the feet.
- The duty of the Brahmins was to perform rituals; the duty of the Kshatriyas was to provide protection; the duty of the Vaishyas was to engage in trade; and the duty of the Shudras was to serve these three Varnas.
The duties of the four varnas according to the Dharmasutras and Dharmashastras
(1) Brahmin: To engage in study, teach the Vedas, perform and conduct sacrifices, and accept gifts and offerings.
(2) Kshatriya: To engage in warfare, provide protection to the people, administer justice, study the Vedas, conduct sacrifices, and give gifts and offerings.
(3) Vaishya: To study the Vedas, conduct sacrifices, give gifts and offerings, and engage in agriculture, cattle-rearing, and trade.
(4) Shudra: To serve the three higher varnas.
Was adherence to Gotra rules mandatory at the time of marriage?
- No.
- Example: The Satavahana kings did not adhere to the rules of the Gotra system.
- The Satavahana kings were identified by their matronyms.
- The queens of the Satavahana kings did not adopt the Gotra of their husbands’ lineage; instead, they retained their fathers’ Gotra even after marriage.
- Some of the queens of the Satavahana kings belonged to the same Gotra, indicating that endogamy was practiced among them.
Gotra
- A *Gotra* was named after a particular sage. Those belonging to that *Gotra* were considered to be the descendants of that specific sage.
- The two primary rules regarding *Gotra* were:
- Members of the same *Gotra* were not permitted to marry one another.
- After marriage, a woman’s *Gotra* was considered to be that of her husband, rather than that of her father.
Polygyny and Polyandry
Polygamy
- The custom of a man having multiple wives is known as polygyny.
- For example: Pandu had two wives—Kunti and Madri.
polyandry
- The custom of a woman having multiple husbands is known as polyandry.
- For example: Draupadi had five husbands.
ncert Class 12 History Chapter 3 Notes
How did you find the notes? Please be sure to share your feedback.